Question #1: What does steady-state flow look like in the pore space of real rocks ?
The conceptual model of relative permeability when carbon dioxide is injected into a deep reservior. Figure credit: Dr Catriona A. Reynolds
Conceptual models of two-phase flow have been used to justify the multiphase extension to Darcy’s Law. Observations from simple, model pore spaces suggest two phase flow occurs via separate, stable channels. As the capillary number increases, the non-wetting phase breaks into discrete ganglia which are advected through the pore space by the non-wetting phase.
Answer #1: Not like we thought it did. Here we present observations of a previously unidentified type of steady-state flow behavior that we term “dynamic connectivity.” We demonstrate that flow of the nonwetting phase occurs through a network of connections that continuously rearrange between filled pores. This observation suggests that we need to modify our models of two-phase flow that are fundamental to describing subsurface flow processes such as geologic CO2 storage and hydrocarbon recovery.
3D rendering of 4D non-weeting phase connectivity during steady state flow.
Dynamic fluid connectivity during steady-state multiphase flow in a sandstone
C.A. Reynolds, H.P. Menke, M.G. Andrew, M.J. Blunt, S.C. Krevor
The current conceptual picture of steady-state multiphase Darcy flow in porous media is that the fluid phases organize into separate flow pathways with stable interfaces. Here we demonstrate a previously unobserved type of steady-state flow behavior, which we term “dynamic connectivity,” using fast pore-scale X-ray imaging. We image the flow of N2
and brine through a permeable sandstone at subsurface reservoir conditions, and low capillary numbers, and at constant fluid saturation. At any instant, the network of pores filled with the nonwetting phase is not necessarily connected. Flow occurs along pathways that periodically reconnect, like cars controlled by traffic lights. This behavior is consistent with an energy balance, where some of the energy of the injected fluids is sporadically converted to create new interfaces.
Question #2: How does steady-state fluid injection interact with acid dissolution?
Model of dissolution regimes. Upper images: wormholing regime in single phase flow. Lower row: coinjection of CO2 and brine. Non-wetting CO2 occupies the low-pC WH seeds of the dissolution structure and suppresses further growth, leading to compact dissolution. Figure Credit: Ott & Oedei 2015 Geophyiscal Research Letters.
Significance: During carbon storage in deep reserviors carbon dioxide (CO2) can be injected as a gas or supercritical fluid. Some of this gas mixes with the pore fluid to become CO2-saturated brine, which is acidic and can dissolve the surrounding rock structure. However, sometimes this mixing is incomplete and a large fraction of the gas remains in the pore-space as the non-wetting phase and affects the relative permeability of the reservior.
So how does the presence of this additional gas phase in the center of the pore-space affect the flow of the acidic brine? How does the reaction rate and pattern change? Preliminary results from Ott and Oedie GRL 2015 (left) on core plugs using low resolution medical CT indicate a dramatic change in dissolution regime.
The aim of this project is to investigate combined reaction and steady-state flow at the pore scale to understand the controlling mechanism behind these regime changes.